1 Cleanspace is from APL2, courtesy of Jon McGrew.
More Subscription Options:
Godel’s Lost Letter
- A Creeping Model Of Computation September 26, 2016
- A Proof Of The Halting Theorem September 20, 2016
- How Hard, Really, is SAT? September 5, 2016
Lambda the Ultimate
- Automating Ad hoc Data Representation Transformations September 22, 2016
- NOOL 2016 September 7, 2016
- PowerShell is open sourced and is available on Linux August 19, 2016
Axis of eval
- Peeking into the future with RDP July 12, 2016One aspect of reactive demand programming that sets it apart from other reactive programming models is its support for optimistically working with the predicted future states of signals.Think about a signal that carries the current time in seconds, that you want to display on screen as a clock. The screen should update close to the […]Manuel Simoni
- The worm is the spice May 19, 2016Just had a nice insight regarding systems that deal with reactively updating (potentially large, structured) values such as RDP:The dynamic output of a process is indistinguishable from a static storage resource (file).In batch systems like Unix, this symmetry is not so deep: the output stream of a process looks somewhat like a file, but the process […]Manuel Simoni
- RESTful RDP with big values August 2, 2015What if you want to use a big value, like a whole database table or weblog, as a Reactive Demand Programming signal value? This would make it possible to use RDP to orchestrate things like incremental MapReduce pipelines. Here's one weird trick to make it work.In effect, each RDP signal becomes a RESTful server, speaking an HTTP-like […]Manuel Simoni
S. Padua (Lovelace & Babbage)
- UK Paperback coming next week! August 21, 2016Greetings faithful Lovelace and Babbagians, those of you in Greenwich Mean Time will shortly have the chance to feast your eyes on the beautiful paperback edition of The Thrilling Adventures, check it out- And look what all these lovely people say on the back! No plans for a paperback in the US as…Sydney Padua
- Eisner Nominations! April 23, 2016Today (assuming I write this post quickly enough, Greenwich Mean Time) is the one-year anniversary of the publication of The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage. So it is extra-gobsmackingly amazing to be able to announce that is has been nominated for two Eisner Awards: Best New Graphic Album and Best Writer/Artist. It’s fairly obvious…Sydney Padua
Vector News Feed
- APL Germany 50th Anniversary Meeting September 4, 2016 Stephen Taylor
- Dyalog Ltd announces Dyalog Version 15.0 July 2, 2016 Stephen Taylor
- Leaping not looping April 18, 2016 Stephen Taylor
- Command Ivy – a new APL interpreter April 18, 2016 Stephen Taylor
- Dyalog North American User Meeting 2016 – DYNA16 February 16, 2016 Stephen Taylor
Thank you for the discussions about the observations of APL’s birthday.
I believe that I am the one who started the practice of using the 1 CLEANSPACE date for carbon-dating APL. When I was publishing an internal newsletter within IBM (The APL Jot Dot Times), I was faced at one point with the question of how old APL is– when did it start? I’m sure we could never really give an absolute starting date, because a nearly-endless stream of ideas must have been considered before Iverson Notation came into being. The suggestion that we consider the 1962 date of the book publication to be a starting point is certainly valid. But what I was trying to do was to give a date to the starting point of the APL implementation on computers. Remember that APL is unique among computer languages in that it wasn’t originally written as a computer language– it was written as a means of letting two people converse unambiguously about math concepts. But then, if two people could converse, how about one person and a computer….
For discussions in the newsletter, and later for commemorating an APL at our internal (IBM APL ITL) conferences, it made sense to choose a date of when the first on-line implementation began. So, choosing the date that the first workspace was saved seemed like a reasonable approach. And since that workspace was (and is) still there, that seemed like the way to go. And even if, as Dick Lathwell pointed out, that workspace might have been recreated at one point, that still seemed like a reasonable approach.
Because the on-line implementation of APL as an executable computer langauge is what gave many of us our careers, that is the event that we chose to commemorate. So, many of us from IBM have spoken over the years of 1966-11-27 as being the starting point for APL’s on-line life. And all of the hard implementation work that the developers put into APL prior to that first saved workspace– well, that was pre-birth for APL.
But yes, if you are commemorating the origin of the notation itself, that would certainly be earlier.
My only objection is that now I can’t anymore say APL is a few years older than me! Sadly, I’m the elder sister.
APL celebrated elsewhere: http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/notation-and-thinking/
Thank you, Professor Shan. Great article!